Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cancer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cancer

    This is five pages long so here's a few quotes:

    'There has been no significant increase in survival rates since records began.

    'The cancer business is second only, in size, to its big brother, petrochemicals. In the 20 years from 1970 to 1990, in the USA alone, the cancer business was worth an estimated 1 trillion dollars ($1,000,000,000,000) (2). If the same percentage of the overall disease bill applies in Britain as in the US, the current (2003) expenditure on cancer will be 4 to 8 billion pounds per year. ...

    'Ever aware of the need to protect their brethren in the petro-pharmaceutical cancer machine, the cancer PR boys, aided and abetted by their on-the-payroll media pals - passing themselves off as unbiased observers - faithfully maintain the line that the whole thing is down to smoking and sun-bathing....


    'One thing that they need to explain is the canine carnage; in a population of 6 million domestic dogs, over a million per year are dying from cancer - or the treatment (3).

    '2003 will see the magic 1 billion UK prescriptions per year - all with side-effects, needing further "medication". An out-of-control deluge of vaccines, antibiotics, analgesics, steroids, antipyretics, anti-inflammatories all add up to a huge onslaught on the body's immune defences. Acute diseases, the body's efforts to regain health, are being continually suppressed by allopathic treatment....

    'Prof. John Gofman MD, PhD, as early as 1980, put the figure for the US alone at 12,000 extra fatal cancers per year. He also stated that around three quarters of breast cancer cases are caused by medical X-rays.

    "I confess that I believed in the irradiation of tonsils, lymph nodes and the thymus gland. I believed my professors when they said the doses we were using were absolutely harmless . Years later the 'absolutely harmless' radiation was reaping a harvest of thyroid tumours." (6)

    'The cancer research fund-raisers' definition of cancer cure is the apparent lack of symptoms for five years. If, or when, the patient dies a year or two after the five years, from the effects of the treatment, they remain in the "cure" statistics: cured and dead at the same time....

    'As for surgery, George Bernard Shaw was of the opinion that "The more appalling the mutilation, the more the mutilator is paid."

    'Chemotherapy involves the use of extremely toxic petrochemical drugs in the hope, never realised, of killing the disease before killing the patient...

    'In the US, an anonymous National Cancer Institute scientist (14) explained "LOOK, WHEN YOU'VE GOT 10,000 RADIOLOGISTS AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF RADIATION EQUIPMENT, YOU GIVE RADIATION TREATMENTS, EVEN IF STUDY AFTER STUDY SHOWS THAT A LOT OF IT DOES MORE HARM THAN GOOD. WHAT ELSE ARE THEY GOING TO DO? LIKE SURGEONS, THEY'VE BEEN TRAINED TO CUT, SO THEY CUT."'

    'The plight of the ever-increasing number of parents of child cancer victims facing "radiotherapy" was well illustrated in October 1993 "... 'I've been told the radiotherapy will cause brain damage knocking forty points off her IQ...Her growth would be stunted...she would need hormones to help her growth and sexual development. It is also likely she would be sterile'." ... Further delights include bone and nerve damage, leading to amputation of limbs, severe bums and, of course, death, at a future time, from cancer and leukaemia due to the highly carcinogenic, immuno-suppressive effects of the huge doses of radiation....

    'The 90-95% death-rate, within 5 years, has not stopped the cancer industry from carrying out the same procedures, day in, day out, for decades: with the same deadly, inevitable results. Temporarily suppressing, with the scalpel, drug or radiation, the symptoms of cancer does nothing for the victim's chances of survival. Adding gross insult to injury, the treatment involves massive doses of carcinogens and super-poisons. The patient is subject to a regime diametrically opposed to that which is needed for survival.


    'A boost to the early detection and cure hoax has been the improved methods used in picking up early cancer - real or imaginary. This has led to an increase of people lasting five years and being put in the cure statistics. Early stage patients are stronger and more likely to survive the assault, whereas, before the improved techniques, patients with more advanced disease succumbed to the disease/treatment before the five years were up....

    'On early detection and orthodox treatment, Prof HB Jones, then the leading US cancer statistician, with over 30 years experience, stated, in 1975, "IT IS UTTER NONSENSE TO CLAIM THAT CATCHING CANCER SYMPTOMS EARLY ENOUGH WILL INCREASE THE PATIENT'S CHANCES OF SURVIVAL. NOT ONE SCIENTIST OR STUDY HAS PROVEN THAT IN ANY WAY. MY STUDIES HAVE PROVED CONCLUSIVELY THAT UNTREATED CANCER VICTIMS LIVE UP TO FOUR TIMES LONGER THAN TREATED INDIVIDUALS. IF ONE HAS CANCERAND OPTS TO DO NOTHING AT ALL, HE WILL LIVE LONGER AND FEEL BETTER THAN IF HE UNDERGOES RADIATION, CHEMOTHERAPY OR SURGERY, OTHER THAN WHEN USED IN IMMEDIATE LIFE-THREATENING SITUATION."

    Breast Cancer:

    'Around 15,000 women, diagnosed with breast cancer, die each year in the UK. The medical cynics, engaged in the ongoing competition to demonstrate that it is quite impossible to insult the intelligence of the public on matters of health, have always found fertile ground in the field of breast cancer, the crowning achievement being when one of the jokers convinced healthy women to have both breasts removed to prevent breast cancer....


    "THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY AND THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, AS A SHOWCASE PROJECT OF THE 'WAR ON CANCER', CO-SPONSORED A MASSIVE X-RAY SCREENING PROGRAM FOR BREAST CANCER - ON 280,000 WOMEN - THE NOTORIOUS MAMMOGRAPHY FOLLIES. WITH KIND SMILES AND POLYANNA COUNSEL, WOMEN WERE ENCOURAGED TO AFFIRM THEIR VIRTUE ON THE ALTAR OF TECHNOLOGY BY EXPOSING THEMSELVES TO PERIODIC RADIATION KNOWN TO INCREASE THE RISK OF THE DISEASE...EMPHASIS WAS PLACED ON RADIATING WOMEN OVER 50, THE VERY AGE GROUP THAT WOULD BE MOST VULNERABLE TO INDUCTION OF CANCER BY RADIATION." (22)

    "Breast scanning increases cancer risks for women...middle aged women who have regular mammograms are more likely to die from breast cancer than those who are not screened..." (30)

    "Breast scanning increases cancer risks for women...middle aged women who have regular mammograms are more likely to die from breast cancer than those who are not screened..." (30)

    'Studies have suggested an increased risk of uterine cancer, 6.4 times higher for those women taking tamoxifen. (27)...

    'On the question of how orthodox cancer treatment "saves" half the women with breast cancer, Dr Irwin Bross is quite unequivocal - half the women don't have breast cancer in the first place:

    "If you are a woman who has been diagnosed as 'early breast cancer'...there is one simple scientific fact that you need to know...more than half the time the pathologist is wrong - it is not actually breast cancer...

    "Breast cancer and prostate cancer are statistical twins. When the functions of these two sexual organs diminish, the cells often become abnormal and look like cancer cells...The Journal of the American Medical Association reported amazingly high survival rates...of untreated early prostate cancer which showed 7 out of 8 tumours were not cancers.


    'The patient who is wrongly diagnosed and has no cancer and is therefore more likely to survive the "therapy", is recorded as a "cancer cure" and is far more likely to develop the disease in the future thanks to the treatment.

    'A mother, writing in a women's magazine, said: "BY THE TIME YOU READ THIS MY SON MICHAEL, WHO IS JUST FIVE, WILL BE ALMOST AT THE END OF A YEARS COURSE OF TREATMENT FOR CANCER...TO SHOW FOR IT MICHAEL HAS A SCAR FROM ONE SIDE OF HIS BODY TO THE OTHER, WHERE DOCTORS REMOVED A HUGE MALIGNANT TUMOUR AND ONE OF HIS KIDNEYS. RADIOTHERAPY AT BARTS HOSPITAL LEFT HIM LIMP LIKE A LITTLE RAG DOLL WITH ALL THE STUFFING KNOCKED OUT OF HIM. CHEMOTHERAPY HAS MADE ALL HIS HAIR FALL OUT. THE DRUGS...MAKE HIM VOMIT FOR HOURS ON END...HIS FACE IS SMALL AND MOSTLY PALE, HIS EYES ARE DARK AND SULLEN AND SHADOWED, THE WAY A CHILD'S EYES SHOULD NEVER BE."

    Whilst it is unknown how long this child stood up to his tormentors, before being killed, it is certain that none of the medical inquisitors were hung, jailed for life, thrown into a padded cell or struck off any medical register.

    'The Cancer Research UK fund-raising syndicate is clawing in over 250 million each year. The highly-paid PR spivs, administrators, organisers, commission-paid agents... aided by an army of semi-conscious supporters, many of whom have seen their relatives and friends destroyed by the treatments produced by the very same organisations that they are supporting have created by far the biggest fraud, medical or otherwise, in history.

    'Animal research plays a major part in the global scam: 800 ways have been found to artificially induce tumours in animals, not one with an atom of relevance to spontaneously occurring cancer in humans.

    'Dr Linus Pauling, double Nobel Laureate, declared "Everyone should know that the 'War on Cancer' is, largely, a fraud."

    Cont ...

  • #2
    'The Pauling Institute were reduced to advertising in the Wall Street Journal for funds: "Our research shows that the incidence and severity of cancer depends on diet. We urgently want to refine that research so that it may help to decrease suffering from human cancer. The US government has absolutely and continually refused to support Dr Pauling and his colleagues here in this work..." (26)...

    'It is a hard clinical fact that leukaemics have pathologically low levels of ascorbic acid in their blood plasma...what kills most leukaemics is...haemorrhage and infection

    'Dr Stone could have hardly expected the fraudsters of the multi-billion dollar/pound "Leukaemia Research" empire to abandon their solid gold source and admit that the disease responded to a simple, inexpensive, non patentable regime of vitamin C or fruit and vegetable juices allied to simple herbs, as was demonstrated by Rudolf Breuss (29) and others....

    "...even one capsule of chloromycetin could cause...leukaemia...I remember a child dying of aplastic anaemia after a general practioner had prescribed chloromycetin for a cold. For a cold, a virus infection! The parents were crying, the kid was bleeding. I was warned by several physicians that grave consequences would befall me if I told the parents that their beautiful child was dying because of a doctor's mindless prescription." Lasko - The Great Billion Dollar Medical Swindle.

    'The fact that no genuine cancer research organisation would go out of its way to protect the main cancer-makers is completely lost on the celebrity supporters, the "Race for Life" runners and the other simpletons, waving collecting tubs in the high street.

    'Cancer Research UK spend 170 million, annually, on 3,000 scientists, whose brief is to avoid any research into holistic, naturopathic, nutritional treatments; therapies which provide the ONLY means to successfully treat a cancer victim.

    "Patients across the UK are supported by a team of some sixty medical nutritionists... ages have ranged from children to the very elderly...those patients...who received no conventional treatment will have the speediest and most trouble-free progress." NCTT - Nutritional Cancer Therapy Trust

    'Animal research has played a fundamental role "...in almost every case the 'patients' tested...were mice (which do not have the same metabolism as humans)...the tumours were transplanted (which do not react the same as spontaneous tumours) and...in all of the experiments cited, reduction of tumour size was the primary criterion for evaluating results...there is nothing quite so easy to accomplish as failure." Dr Richardson (39)

    Or success: depending on which animal you choose and whether he who bank-rolls the research wants a positive or a negative result.


    "There will be a medical edition of the Nuremberg Trials. The atrocities now being committed in the name of orthodox medicine, the suppression of life giving data, the needless loss of lives, mutilation of bodies and excessive suffering will not continue to be tolerated...ultimately, these criminals and their political lackeys will be brought to trial." (43)

    "The medical model regards cancer as a new race of cells bent on destroying its host by non-cooperation and over-breeding. The invaders are to be killed off by cutting them out, by burning them or poisoning them, preferably short of killing their host. The treatment is conducted by teams of specialised professionals using the body as a passive battleground....The old idea that a doctor should 'first do no harm' has been forgotten… No wonder that the public is beginning to revolt against such barbarous treatment" (42)

    'Bereaved relatives need to realise that very few patients die from cancer and that those responsible for the painful, premature deaths would, if they were in any other field, have been brought into court long ago. The legal profession, not slow to come forward in other aspects of medical litigation, are strangely reluctant in this area.

    'Highly-paid professional liars of the cancer business PR department, aided by hopelessly transparent media agents in the form of "medical correspondents", "science editors", "social affairs/health correspondents" etc., provide regular Cancer Research Breakthroughs, whilst the holocaust worsens continually....

    Link: http://www.bava.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk...sinesspt1.html



    I think this guy is on the button here.

    Comment


    • #3
      Wow. Thank you for posting that.

      Though i don't think i buy into all of it, some of it i already suspected. More and more i see how medicine is violating it's Hippocratic oath to "do no harm."

      Comment


      • #4
        yeah~ me too

        i will not buy all of them, but i will try some of them

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by gamequeen88 View Post
          yeah~ me too

          i will not buy all of them, but i will try some of them
          Hello and welcome, gamequeen88, but you might not get a reply if you post in threads about a year and a half old.

          Comment


          • #6
            god, sorry,

            i just find this topic is interesting, and didn't find the date.

            Comment

            Working...
            X