Go Back   Scotland Discussion Forum > Culture > Religion and Philosophy

Notices


Sun god obelisks in UK

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 6th December 2013, 15:36
tig's Avatar
tig tig is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 2,014
only the protestant faith doesnt have icons mate.....most of the rest of Christianity does so whats your point?

i dont think anyone "idols" the queen either tbh

and which pagan kings where related to the queen exactly?
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 6th December 2013, 19:16
Babz's Avatar
Babz Babz is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Denaby Main
Posts: 24,310
I quite like the idea of Sun God Obelisks but wouldn't fancy cleaning them !!!!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 7th December 2013, 13:57
fluxed fluxed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by tig View Post
only the protestant faith doesnt have icons mate.....most of the rest of Christianity does so whats your point?

i dont think anyone "idols" the queen either tbh

and which pagan kings where related to the queen exactly?
1) The christian faith, whether catholic or protestant, was founded
on the premise that paganism was full of evils. We all know that.

2) Where ever we see Egyptian obelisks, we see the children of pharoah
ruling that land.

2) All the kings of the UK were pagan kings - most people knew that
also, from history education. These are the forefathers of the queen
today.

Imagine the urgency in the royal household
to keep hold of us, following the failure of their
old religion due to its evils. While at the same time,
keeping the populace in the dark concerning
christian monks being sons of still pagan kings etc...
and the obvious divinity issue.
They had to keep hold of us to fight their wars for them
and exploit us as they have always done....

''The terrors of war, during even the fifth and sixth
centuries, drove the Scots and Britons to seek
refuge in the extremities of the island. From this period
'genuine religion' began to decline in the country,
and was fast approaching to a complete exit, when two
circumstances, concomitant with the labours of Columba,
contributed to its revival and establishment.
Ethelbert, King of Kent, had married a Christian princess
of the house of Clovis...''

History of the Town and Castle of Dumbarton

Notice in the above, failure to mention the important
facts that King Clovis was a pagan as were Ethelbert's
forefathers before him.

These kings changed their source of divine authority , willy nilly;
As soon as the royal branches declared the pagan gods as fake,
then all those pagan kings are criminalising their own history
and foundation.

They should have been thrown out and held to
account for all the enforced pagan laws over centuries.
And the punishments passed, under pagan laws coming from
pagan kings who believe in demons and superstition.

What about all the wars? The ones where the pagan kings
call out to pagan gods for inspirationns to cause a war?

And the UK ? This land was first taken by pagan kings and these
kings had established themselves before converting to christianity.

So they claimed this land using the rights from pagan gods / ancestors.


And to connect the term 'pagan' with pharaoh -
The first kings, in Egypt, founded the sun cult which spread around the world.
All the British pagan kings were, like pharaoh, seen to represent the 'luck of his people'.
Egypt was the idol worship capital of the world, in ancient times.

Egyptian ships have been found off the coast of England.

The most important aspect of my research is the discovery that all
superstition came, with the Egyptian priesthood, thousands of years BC.

The world was forced into superstition, by the children of pharaoh.

'Jesus' arrived and exposed the children of pharaoh and their royal religion.

So the royal branches designed a new religion. The main branches being - Egypt , UK, Rome, Israel
in ancient times. All these four superpowers, concocted the new religion.
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 7th December 2013, 14:35
fluxed fluxed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babz View Post
I quite like the idea of Sun God Obelisks but wouldn't fancy cleaning them !!!!
The idea looks interesting enough.

Now i have a better understanding , of what they represent,
i would consider them 'satanic' and these monuments were
standing in Egypt, 3000years ago, witness to the most degrading
treatment of slaves, by a royal family worshipping this sun god.


The royal family was exposed by 'Jesus'. All around the western world,
the royal branches had to go undercover with their pagan love.

But as i point above, the royals are less concerned today.
Hence the placing of sphinxes near the London obelisk.


Royalty was educated first.
Royalty worshipped the sun and idols, first.
This was made official around the world.
The forefathers of the queen, sponsored state paganism.
The whole of the UK was at one time ruled by pagan kings.

The point here - it was a royal religion and was not
founded by the people.
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10th December 2013, 11:52
fluxed fluxed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 19
Rome was a child of Egypt, evidenced here...

Emperor Hadrian erected an obelisk which bears
his name, and that of his wife Sabina.
Hadrian founded a magnificent city in lower Egypt
where this obelisk was erected A.D. 131.
Some years later the obelisk was removed from
Egypt to Rome.
..it lay concealed in the earth near the Church of Santa
Croce in Gerusalemme till the year 1822, when Pope
Pius VI I. had it mounted upon a pedestal..

Translated hieroglyphs...
" The son of the sun, Lord of diadems, Hadrianus Kaisoros."
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10th December 2013, 12:04
tig's Avatar
tig tig is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 2,014
Quote:
2) All the kings of the UK were pagan kings - most people knew that
also, from history education. These are the forefathers of the queen
today.
the current queen has no relations to any way to any ancient kings of the uk, pagan or otherwise.
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11th December 2013, 12:25
fluxed fluxed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by tig View Post
the current queen has no relations to any way to any ancient kings of the uk, pagan or otherwise.

Why are you misinforming people?

Do you deny King Penda was a pagan monarch?


Name: King Athelstan
Born: c.895
Parents: Edward the Elder and Ecgywn
Relation to Elizabeth II: 30th great-granduncle
House of: Wessex

Aethelstan`s descent was therefore through the old ruling families of Mercia and Wessex. ( King Penda )

What about King Cnut, the pagan Danish monarch?

Name: King Cnut (Canute)
Born: c.995 at Denmark
Parents: Sweyn I (Forkbeard) and Gunhilda
Relation to Elizabeth II: husband of the 27th great-grandaunt
House of: Denmark

Kings & Queens - Age of Ascent


There it is onlookers. Blatant evidence, this tig is not informing us
with the truth.

All of the Queens forefathers were pagan - fact.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC4 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.