Religion

[ScotSites]

I have nothing against anyone following a particular religion or even starting a topic about religion (or to make a point about it). However, the stuff that is being posted by dattaswami doesn't really seem to be about anything... or if it is lots of people are missing the point he/she is trying to make! So in all honesty what's the point in allowing this person to continue to post as what he is posting is just spam; even when he/she replies to a comment made its never even a reply, but more of the same rubbish! So, as far as I am concerned, this person should be BANNED and this section of the forum can get back to actually DISCUSSING religion rather than have someone preaching (tho I really mean SPAMMING) about it!

[Polwarth]

I echo your sentiments.

He smacks of thon ither nutter fae Sri Lanka or wherever, aka Digital Vampire.... but from a slightly different perspective

[dattaswami]

Originally Posted by ScotSites

I have nothing against anyone following a particular religion or even starting a topic about religion (or to make a point about it). However, the stuff that is being posted by dattaswami doesn't really seem to be about anything... or if it is lots of people are missing the point he/she is trying to make! So in all honesty what's the point in allowing this person to continue to post as what he is posting is just spam; even when he/she replies to a comment made its never even a reply, but more of the same rubbish! So, as far as I am concerned, this person should be BANNED and this section of the forum can get back to actually DISCUSSING religion rather than have someone preaching (tho I really mean SPAMMING) about it!

My main aim to propagate the divine knowledge
On this earth is Universal Spirituality
For World Peace, because there should not be difference
Based on the religion, two people should not fight
For the sake of Nivrutti, which is reaching the Lord.
Nivrutti is related to Lord and is very sacred.
Should one stab another for the sake of this?
In India have you not heard of a Muslim stabbing Hindu
And vice-versa just for the sake of religion?
There is meaning if two fight for wealth etc.,
Which is Pravrutti, Pandavas and Kauravas fought
With each other for wealth, it is justified
Both belong to the same Hindu religion
They did not fight for the religion
It is shameful for the Lord to see such fights!
The same Lord is in two different dresses.
And you both are fighting for the difference in the dress!
You are not recognizing that the same teacher came
And taught the same syllabus in two different languages.
To one class He came in red shirt and to another class
He came in white shirt, you are fighting for His shirts!
You are fighting for the two languages, which differ.
The teacher is the same and the syllabus is the same.
You sit and analyze the contents of His teaching.
You treat the teacher as your Master in your section.
Is He not the Master for the other section also?
Both the sections constitute the whole school.
You say that He is the Master of the whole school.

The school consists off two distinct sections vividly.
If you say that He is the Master of the whole school,
The school must contain only your section, then only
Your statement is right, but the school shows two sections.
Your statements are contradicting each other clearly.
Hindus say that Brahman is the creator, Muslims say
That Allah is creator, Christians say that the creator is
Jehovah, all say that the creation is this entire world.
If Hindus say that Brahman created India, and if
Muslims say that Allah created Arabian countries and
If Christians say that Jehovah created the western countries,
The problem is solved, there can be three Gods together,
Who have created the three parts of the earth separately.
But this is not so, each religion says that their God only
Created the entire world, unfortunately there is one world!
One world only! Come on, all of you sit together here
And give me the final conclusion after debate, otherwise,
The scientists are laughing on all of you! Shame to all!

They criticize that these religions do not have even
The basic logic, which is the fundamental common sense.
Because of you, the greatest God is also mocked by them
They say that the religions are rigid conservatisms!
Even a small boy is putting this question to all of you.
Stop all your discourses and first answer this question.
If you want to say that God created the entire world,
You have to accept that there is one God only always
And that His names are all the above three names.
We see in the world a single person having three names.
If there is one God, He only created this entire world.
All the human beings are invariably His children only.
No Father is partial to a single child and therefore
He must have preached the same knowledge to all
In different languages and in different methodologies
To different levels, this is Universal Spirituality.

I find Christians trying to convert Hindus in India.
Similarly Hindus are trying to convert Christians in West.
Do you think that Hinduism and Christianity are two
Different political parties to rule the spiritual kingdom?
These conversions then become very much essential,
Because the ruling party must have a clear majority.
Jesus said that majority of people are traveling
On a very wide high way that leads to hell! He also told
That the way to Him is very narrow with few people only!
Krishna told that one in millions can only reach Him!
Both Jesus and Krishna speak about qualitative minority
And not about useless quantitative majority, realize this.
If you analyze, both philosophies are one and the same.

Buddhism is an offspring of Hinduism, both are same.
Buddha is the incarnation of Vishnu, God of Hinduism.
Islam and Christianity are separated just on one point only.
Islam treats the prophet as messenger of God, Christianity
Treats the prophet as son of God or God Himself also.
Hinduism contains all these three views of the same point.
Whether the prophet is the messenger or the son of God
Or God Himself, think, how does it matter as far as
The message of God is concerned? Since God is same
And His message is also the same. Whether God says
Or His son says or His messenger says, no difference,
In all the three cases it is the message of God only.
Unable to practice the message of God, all of you are
Quarreling seriously on unnecessary immaterial point!
Let all the human beings on this earth recognise one God,
Let them recognise the only one path that is sacrifice,
Let them recognise themselves created by the same God
And therefore they are brothers and sisters in this world.
Let there not be stabbings of brothers for the sake of God.
Let there not be wars based on religious differences.

[ScotSites]

Originally Posted by dattaswami

My main aim to propagate the divine knowledge...

... and you do that by good old copy and paste? Maybe if you showed us you were human and actually posted a response that makes sense to questions asked or comments made we would feel different. But that doesn't seem to be your style does it? So why don't you GIVE IT A REST... and go bug someone on another forum!

[Celyn]

Originally Posted by dattaswami

...
Let there not be stabbings of brothers for the sake of God.
Let there not be wars based on religious differences.

Oh now, there's an idea.



(sound of hollow laughter)

[ANDY-J3]

Dattaswami fancies himself to be some kind of enlightened guru but if he were enlightened he would realise you should only preach sermons to people who want to listen to your teachings. I think it's clear no one here has expressed any interest whatsoever in anything that he's preached so by continuing to sermonise he's only showing disrespect and insulting people's intelligence.

[ANDY-J3]

Originally posted by dattaswami
Buddhism is an offspring of Hinduism, both are same.

Buddhism is a non theistic system of practical philosophy based on adherence to a set of moral precepts. Hinduism is a polytheistic religion based on theological doctrines. They aren't even remotely similar.