Only one God created this world

[dattaswami]

Only one God created this world

Hindus say that Brahman is the creator, Muslims say
That Allah is creator, Christians say that the creator is
Jehovah, all say that the creation is this entire world.
If Hindus say that Brahman created India, and if
Muslims say that Allah created Arabian countries and
If Christians say that Jehovah created the western countries,
The problem is solved, there can be three Gods together,
Who have created the three parts of the earth separately.
But this is not so, each religion says that their God only
Created the entire world, unfortunately there is one world!
One world only! Come on, all of you sit together here
And give me the final conclusion after debate, otherwise,
The scientists are laughing on all of you! Shame to all!
They criticize that these religions do not have even
The basic logic, which is the fundamental common sense.
Because of you, the greatest God is also mocked by them
They say that the religions are rigid conservatisms!
Even a small boy is putting this question to all of you.

Stop all your discourses and first answer this question.
If you want to say that God created the entire world,
You have to accept that there is one God only always
And that His names are all the above three names.
We see in the world a single person having three names.
If there is one God, He only created this entire world.
All the human beings are invariably His children only.
No Father is partial to a single child and therefore
He must have preached the same knowledge to all
In different languages and in different methodologies
To different levels, this is Universal Spirituality.
Universal-Spirituality

[ScotsmanRS]

I'm sure there are plenty differences between these gods (especially Brahma in comparison to the Abrahamic ones). These messages are all different, again with the Hindu one being significantly different. If this is the same god, why has he told so many different stories? Is he a liar? Surely that's against one of his own commandments? Furthermore, why would he make these other personas if he is then going to punish people for worshipping the wrong one?

How do you know your Jehova is the right god? Why are you not scared of deceiving Brahma? What more proof do you have for Jehova than a Hindu can produce for Brahma?

The final (and probably most important) point I want to bring up in this post is this: to say that one of these three created Earth (or all three in some sort of simultaneous schizophrenic lie), you are making the assumption that the only plausible explanation for our existence is a deity of some sort, despite the fact we have much better models of how we came to be which actually have evidence to back them up. Why would you even make that assumption in the first place when you know better explanations exist?

I'd like an answer to all points I've brought up.

[tig]

christains believe in jehova????

johovas witnesses do

copy n pastin off some religious wacko site aint gonna win any arguments on here mate

[MAGUS]

Religion has existed for thousands of years it was invented by man because of the fear of death. Not one single piece of evidence in all that time has been produced to prove the existence of any god.

[dattaswami]

Originally Posted by ScotsmanRS

I'm sure there are plenty differences between these gods (especially Brahma in comparison to the Abrahamic ones). These messages are all different, again with the Hindu one being significantly different. If this is the same god, why has he told so many different stories? Is he a liar? Surely that's against one of his own commandments? Furthermore, why would he make these other personas if he is then going to punish people for worshipping the wrong one?

How do you know your Jehova is the right god? Why are you not scared of deceiving Brahma? What more proof do you have for Jehova than a Hindu can produce for Brahma?

The final (and probably most important) point I want to bring up in this post is this: to say that one of these three created Earth (or all three in some sort of simultaneous schizophrenic lie), you are making the assumption that the only plausible explanation for our existence is a deity of some sort, despite the fact we have much better models of how we came to be which actually have evidence to back them up. Why would you even make that assumption in the first place when you know better explanations exist?

I'd like an answer to all points I've brought up.

The same Lord came to different parts of the world in different age to preach the same Divine Knowledge. All the scriptures of the world are the records of the knowledge given by the same Lord and hence cannot contradict each other. Yet we find sometimes that there are some glaring contradictions between different scriptures of the world. This is in part due to fact that the Lord taught the same truth in different ages and places in a slightly different way, so as to suit the culture and language of the people. This is only an extraneous difference. The essential knowledge is the same. Correct interpretation will remove the contradiction.
Sometimes there may be an apparent difference even in the essential meaning.

In such as case the inconsistency is probably caused by corruption of the scripture over generations. Comparison with other scriptures of the world will help in removing the corrupted portions in each scripture. Here it becomes essential to bring in experience as a prama?a or a valid means of knowledge. While comparing contradictory views in different scriptures, the view which agrees with experience or anubhuti should be taken as correct.

[dattaswami]

Originally Posted by tig

christains believe in jehova????

johovas witnesses do

copy n pastin off some religious wacko site aint gonna win any arguments on here mate

Today the development of science is terrible, which is the faculty of logic and analysis. Today the heart is reduced and the brain is expanded. The old generations were having a broad heart and less brain. The heart can be inspired by appeals but the brain will not be satisfied by appeals. If you appeal “All the human beings are one and the same internally and externally. God is one only. Do not quarrel with each other and be united as one family”, the effect of such appeal is temporary only. When the devotee returns back, the emotion is subsided by next day itself.

The reason is that his or her intellectual facility (Buddhi) is not satisfied. You have not given the logical analysis of such concepts. You have worked at the level of mind only and not at the level of intelligence. Mind is the steering rod and the intelligence is the driver. Mind is in the hands of intelligence. Due to this reason only, the Lord started Gita with the concept of knowledge and analysis (Buddhi Yoga). The driving knowledge of the driver is more important than the driver. The correct driving depends on the correct driving knowledge imparted on him by the teacher of the driving school, who is the Satguru.

In the case of Arjuna, the teacher of the driving school himself became the driver! You cannot imagine the fortune of Arjuna. When God Himself became the driver, He is called as Satguru. The word Sat is used to mean God. Guru means guide.