Can you disprove the Existance of God?

[Jock_Tams_Bairn]

While we may not be able to disprove gods existance, your proof is a bunch of folklore that has been passed down from generation to generation of Jews and the other holy bool, a bunch of gossip which is incomplete.

While I am agnostic, I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt within my mind that YOUR god doesnt exist

[Sharp_Kid]

It's so reassuring to come back to find the same sort of idiots defending their faith in the same ill-educated, misinformed and misguided manner.

So, the rules of logic can not be proven to work because you can only do so by using the laws of logic?
So the only way to measure a metre rule is to use another metre rule which means we all disappear in a puff of length?
Logic is obviously arbitrary to a degree in that we have assigned the positive and negative which make up logic. The zero and the one, the yes and the no.
But they still exist whether we give them a name or not, unless you wish to turn this debate into an "existence only by observation" debate.
And that crazy nonsense about the crackers in the pantry. You know they're there because you can see them, touch them, feel them, taste them, smell them.
And don't give me this "But I can see God. I can feel Him. I can touch Him. You can't. You may be able to observe the results of what you believe to be God, but they're in fact a combination of the universe, the laws of thermodynamics, and your own gullibility.
You people are more damaging to the world than you'll ever know, and I salute you.

[Sharp_Kid]

Originally Posted by patoonce

...your using it...

And your grammar is terrible.
HAHAHAAAAAAA!

[ANDY-J3]

Richard Dawkins is currently doing a show on Channel 4 called the root of all evil dealing with the dangers posed by religion and he quoted Bertrand Russell who stated

"Many orthodox people speak as though it were the business of sceptics to disprove received dogmas rather than of dogmatists to prove them. This is, of course, a mistake. If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time."

[DrJames]

You cannot tell me taht you did not read it. or how would you know that the grammer is bad?

Got you.

You should not have any problem proving the teaching of an ill-educated I fool wrong, do you?
You should just go ahead and disprove it, instead of having a frog stuck up in your gut.

[patoonce]

Originally Posted by Sharp_Kid

And your grammar is terrible.
HAHAHAAAAAAA!

Thanks Kid! I'll keep my eye on it.

[patoonce]

Originally Posted by DrJames

You cannot tell me taht you did not read it. or how would you know that the grammer is bad?

Got you.

You should not have any problem proving the teaching of an ill-educated I fool wrong, do you?
You should just go ahead and disprove it, instead of having a frog stuck up in your gut.

Watch out Dr. James. I think it's grammar. You lose and the kid wins...lol.