|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
But as far as whether the Bible is responsible for violence, I have to agree with Fear. Though religion is often taken as the reason or source for conflict or violence, it is not the religion (or the Bible) that is the source of it, but how individuals or groups of people are interpreting it and using it to justify self-righteousness and superiority over others. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Christians have murdered and slaughtered tens of thousands in the Crusades in the name of Christianity. The one Christian pharoah put thousands to death for not converting to Christianity. Constantine, so revered for spreading CHristianity, declared it the only religion of the Roman Empire and tortured pagan priests to death and murdered, evicted, imprisoned and tortured countless non-Christians throughout the Roman Empire. Christian Serbs committed horrifying war-crimes and genocide against Muslims during the Bosnian war conflict in their crusade for "ethnic cleansing." "And when I saw religious symbols being used with such devastating manipulation and power from 1989 to the present, I felt someone had to get involved and study it. And the more I got involved, the more I found that the religious mythology was indeed a central cause, a motivating factor, in the genocide." - Dr. Michael Sells, author of the The Bridge Betrayed: Religion and Genocide in Bosnia. Hitler's actions were as you said, "contrary to the Bible".... what a convenient argument for you to attempt to disown Christian ethnic cleansing. But during WWII many Christians (not all, certainly) used Christianity precisely as justification for the genocide and torture of the Jews and Gypsies. It is precisely your type of argument that they used to argue their superiority, as well. There are plenty more examples of crime in the name of Christian faith. Christianity most definitely does not have lilly-white hands in war and religious persecution. To claim that it is somehow superior in this regard is utterly fallaceous. Einstein, Ghandi, Thich Nhat Hanh, Aristotle, Benjamin Franklyn, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, are just a few non-Christians who have contributed greatly to humanity. There is plenty of reason to be proud of being Christian and the many positive things Christianity and CHristians have brought to the world, but to claim it is somehow superior and ignore and discount evidence of Christian history's atrocities in order to claim superiority over other religions and peoples is childish and ignorant at best, and fanatical and bigotted at worst. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Please note for your future arguments: Anecdotal evidence is not proof of either causality or majority. It can only be used to prove universal statements (such as several you are trying to make) to be untrue. Diagramatically, your "logical" argument is akin to: Kitty is a mammal, all dogs are mammals, therefore kitty is a dog. You are saying: People from non-Christian nations want to get into the U.S., U.K., etc. The U.S., U.K. etc. are predominantly Christian, therefore immigrants from non-Christian nations want to be Christian (or in a Christian nation, shall we say). This is a totally unsupported conclusion and very bigotted. Use your passion for personal faith, not arrogance and self-righteousness. There are more non-Christians on this earth than Christians and they are not by majority clamouring to basque in Christian influence. Non-Christians largely do not want to be "saved" by Christianity and the western world, rather they are happy with their own faith, moving in their own direction, and find this kind of arrogance and attempt at domination offensive, and quite understandably. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Pure religion in the sight of our God and Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world." (James 1:27) www.personal.psu.edu/bmd175 |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Pure religion in the sight of our God and Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world." (James 1:27) www.personal.psu.edu/bmd175 |
|
|||
|
Thanks HollyElise for exposing your IGNORANCE.
Jesus read the Bible and quoted the Bible. Example: Luke 4:14-21. (read) Quotes: Matthew 4:1-11; 5:17-48, etc. Now you are the one with a puerile CREDIBILITY. Many things you say are too shallow. [Edited by Theja on 2nd July 2003 at 06:48] |
|
|||
|
The reason I stated some general observations about cruelty perpetrated in the past by godless men were meant for readers to SEE THE BIG PICTURE.
People keep blaming the Bible for the things done contrary to and in ignorance of the teachings of the Bible. Interpreted accurately and observed faithfully, the Bible is the best influence the world have ever seen. We can debate this till kingdom come, so I'm not interested in that. But I know there are both historical and contemporary facts to back that up. As a starter, any interested person can, if you can find, read the book by Dr.James Kennedy : " What if Jesus had never been born?" Also a book by Dr. Don Richardson: "Peace Child", Readers Digest award. About several tribes in Papua New Guinea in perpetual enmity and war until the Gospel transformed them and introduced them to the civilized world. Warning: once you flip a few pages, you can't put it down. Its ok to have red eyes in the morning and sleep in your job (kidding). |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:25.



Linear Mode
