Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tartan Paint
Yes it has. It's got everything to do with it. "Lowland" Scots inherited a 'Saxon ancestry' in 1746. Your article made that clear. All this despite the fact that no Saxon invasion was ever recorded and roughly 80% of the Government troops were Scots. Don't look for me to give you any reasons to "bother". I ask myself why you bother in the first place. It's part of Celtic culture to repeat nonsense like this over and over and over again. It's time to let go of the past. I know it's a cliche but harping on about Culloden doesn't achieve anything.
|
Stop making assumptions! I have
repeatedly explained that the only point I've been making is that the term "Sassenach" is also used, particularly in the past, by Highlanders to describe Lowland Scots. This is a
fact, and I simply stated it as such without making any political or offensive comments of any kind.
You are the one who mentioned Culloden! The line in the link I provided that should have stood out, given the context of our chat, is
Sassenach means 'of Saxon origin' and was applied equally to Lowland Scots as to the English. Who said anything about "Celtic culture"? I know I didn't. In fact, I've already posted tonight about how that doesn't exist in the first place, which I suppose is a fine example of the keen gift you have for second guessing me. My name may be Gaelic, and the location I give may be Gaelic - but how does that give you the right to repeatedly suggest I am pursuing some agenda or can't "let go of the past" and to post disparaging comments about Highlanders? It is blatantly transparent that if either of us has some agenda to push here, then it's you.