Go Back   Scotland Discussion Forum > Culture > Clans


STEWARTS OF FENWICK

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 2nd August 2004, 12:28
Polwarth Polwarth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,251
Dinnae fash yersel, Marti - he's like Patton.... he'll be back!

I wish I had a pound for every person who thinks they've discovered Scotland's rightful king.... and all of them bring information re the wee Belgian. He used to sell kilts at Hector Russell you know! Either that or selling toot n tat to tourists in Romanes and Paterson's - cannae mind which!

The LaFosse man has had about 20 different websites on the internet. As soon as his latest 'claims' are exposed as fakes and untruths, he closes that site and moves on to start a new one. Smoke and mirrors....
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 3rd August 2004, 15:19
Polwarth Polwarth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,251
I had a quick look to try to find out where the discredited Mr Lafosse was now posting his erstwhile 'claim'.... and found that he has accepted another phony 'order' from another group of phonies calling themselves Hospitallers of St John...

See bottom of page IV http://www.saintjohn.org/other/selforders.html
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 3rd August 2004, 23:45
normandebrus normandebrus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 31
Religous text?

Marhar wrote:

If you want to spout any more religious texts please take it to the religious forum and not in clans.

~~~

normandebrus responds:

Had you actually read it you would know that it is a deconstruction of a religious text for the sake of establishing some geneaology, something no one else is doing to much of an extent here.

*
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 3rd August 2004, 23:48
normandebrus normandebrus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 31
"Pseudo-historians"...

...is a term that people use to encourage people to outright disregard something that is best rejected based on its merits or lack thereor. If you have a superior history up your sleeve, please divulge it. HISTORIANS do not reject something just because it has religious overtones. Historians establish whether or not a thing is true and this takes precedence over what these things might mean for one's pet worldview.

*
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 3rd August 2004, 23:50
normandebrus normandebrus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 31
Albany a Fraud?

The European Council of Princes does not agree and I am STILL waiting for anyone that would rebut to actually do so with referencable facts.

*

Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 3rd August 2004, 23:59
normandebrus normandebrus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 31
"LaFosse"

Polwarth wrote:

Ah've telt youse afore..... ignorance is bliss and this wan is proof of the truth o that

'Prince' Michael.... BWAAAHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAA Holy Grail? ditto!

Mr Brus
Here is the site which has exposed many of the false claims of so-called European royalty and chieftainships..... Sean Murphy is a world-famous Irish genealogist.. This is his report on the de-bunking of the claims of the little Belgian aka Michel laFosse... the mannie you seem to think is the rightful Stuart heir to the Throne of Scotland..
http://homepage.eircom.net/~seanjmur...fs/lafosse.htm

Enough 'facts' even for a numpty like you?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

normandebrus responds:

It is sad that I have had to press for days to get someone to divulge something like this. You do, however continue to insist that I have taken sides on this issue and the only side I have taken is that of people who actually back up their opinions, the type of person you have finally decided to become. As I promised, over and over, I will look into any sizeable body of research that disputes the Jacobite Claim.

When I have digested it (it takes time to be critical but it is easy and quick to just accept or reject something because of personal biases), I will return to this thread. I have also just come into a voluminous amount of information relating to an alleged fraudulency about Michael the Stewart from another source and I must analyze. Thank you for finally providing something I have only been asking for for over a week now. You could have saved all of us a lot of trouble and stress by foresaking the condescension and actually allowing yourself to be put out enough to provide sources. In the interest of the pursuit of knowledge, this is the path that manifests such.

Thank you.

*
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 4th August 2004, 08:34
Polwarth Polwarth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,251
As the information I have provided is well known to most Scots - I feel that if YOU want information, then go and look for it.. after all, that's what HISTORIANS do...

The Council of Princes is another 'bogus', 'pseudo' organisation - the German princeling from whom Michel laFosse says he took over as 'head' of the organisation denies it categorically. No, I'm not going to look for it for you.

I am done trying to educate you. Perhaps if YOU had researched before writing such utter rubbish on this thread, you'd have saved YOURSELF the stress - personally, I'm under no stress, and neither would it appear, are the other Scots on here, such as Nonny, Marhar, Marti etc.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC4 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.