[kathyv]

One such 'punch' in the evolution theory are polystrat fossils. These are a fact, have been found all over the world and point to a catastrophic flood event. . .

Another punch are the many evolutionists who have publicly stated that evolution is in itself a theory, not a fact, and can't be completely scientifically supported. Including the man himself, Charles Darwin.


I think a lot of the evolutionary sciences look at an adaptation and label it evolving.


Something that I find odd, and a punch in the creationists side are the eohippus questions. There are several reasons, according to creationists, why the eohippus can't point to evolution into the horse and one of their reasonings are the numbers of ribs found in several fossils varies, this is taken by creationists as proof of non evolution. However, modern horse has a breed with different numbers of ribs, the Arabian has 1 set of ribs fewer than other horse breeds so I do question the reasoning of creationists using that as support.

I question it all, because I wish to continue learning but I don't let it disrupt my life. I also don't insist that anyone look at my views as fact.

And Bell, I haven't called you dumb or your views stupid. If there is something that you believe as truth but you have nothing tangible to support it, but you still believe it, isn't that faith? Do you have a brain? Have you ever seen it? Can you touch it? Can you take it out and prove to me that you actually have one or do I have to take it on faith that it's there?