|
Lets see if I've got this
Tom has an imaginary friend called Adam.
Adam goes into an imaginary room, wittnessed by imaginary people, and, when other imaginary people go into the imaginary room Tom’s imaginary friend has disappeared.
And as a result we can deduce that there are poltergeists
um err
Tom here are someother little nit picnics
all sitting on the field, and at the same time leaving up in the air and in the same direction.
Any sensible person can see that it was a group mind or one 'leader' bird communicated the 'plan' to the rest, in a fraction of a second
You have contradicted yourself in the same paragraph. Do you mean at the same time or a fraction of a second later, How large is a fraction of a second.
Obviously I am not a sensible person
microstatum, paraspycology
I‘ve not read any books on these subjects, Please provide references
If a man really is stupid . . then our calling him "stupid" is not really an insult
I like to call a spade a geomorphological modification instrument
We have mammals like sharks, for example
I always thought that a shark was a fish, perhaps you’ve read a book by a man who knows better
The masses only really know (b) and very little at that
Would that be the ignorant masses (see below)
Animals are psychic, and this is plain for all to see
But not all animals are telepathic (see below)
it is not plain for me to see
There are key photographs which never were falsified, of UFOS in particular.
Ah yes I forgot about those photographs
We know that bears do not hunt sheep because the sheep are too quick. But the bears had to attempt to chase them in order to know that. Yet I have never seen footage of a bear even attempting to catch gulls
I’ve never seen footage of a bear hunting a sheep, never mind a quick sheep, but then pigs can fly.
I would say that most animals are telepathic
But all animals are psychic (see above)
The very word poltergeists is relatively recent
From the German Poltern (to crash about) and geist (a ghost). I’m sure your familiar with the German habit of joining to words together to make a third word.
How recent is relatively. Is it similar to a fraction of a second
Why are you irrate? Why are you getting emotional? I hadn't realized this was a children's fight after school. But that makes me wonder
Kettle, pot, black come to mind
we do not draw conclusions
You are doing exactly the opposite of what you say you are doing:
I have concluded that I do not draw conclusions
You are the ones who draw conclusions: "Adam did not really disappear into the room, the stress of the sunlight made you envisage Adam going into the room." Good one!
I agree with you on this point:
Adam did not disappear into the room because Adam did not exist (see above)
in a humble and diplomatic way
I equate that with mental laziness and possible stupity
I am trying to be less and less offensive
that only a stupid fool can't see what is happening
based on usually regular people
Would these regular people be the same as ‘the ignorant masses’ (see above
that poltergeists are collectively shown to exist - and only human stupidity can't see that.
Well, that puts me in my place then
I am trying to be less and less offensive
I equate that with mental laziness and possible stupity
that only a stupid fool can't see what is happening
in a humble and diplomatic way
|